← Back to Security Blog
🏛️ REGELGEVING 7 maart 2026 · 9 min leestijd

Trumps cyberstrategie vs EU-regelgeving: VS dereguleert terwijl Europa NIS2-handhaving aanscherpt

Trumps nieuwe cyberbeveiligingsstrategie legt de nadruk op offensieve operaties en deregulering — het tegenovergestelde van Europas NIS2- en DORA-complianceaanpak. Wat deze regelgevingsdivergentie betekent voor mondiale beveiligingsteams.


🔴 Breaking: Trump's Cybersecurity Strategy — Offense Over Compliance

Het Witte Huis heeft gepubliceerd President Trump's seven-page cyberbeveiligingsstrategie, developed by the Office of the National Cyber Director (ONCD). It represents a fundamental shift in US cyber policy by placing offensive operations at the center while actively pushing deregulation.

De strategie is gebaseerd op six pillars:

PillarFocusKey Implication
1. Shape Adversary BehaviorOffensive cyber operationsProactive disruption of adversary networks before attacks
2. Promote "Common Sense" RegulationDeregulationRolling back mandatory cybersecurity standards
3. Modernize Federal NetworksZero trust, post-quantum, AICloud migration and AI-powered defenses
4. Secure Kritieke infrastructuurHardening essential servicesRemove adversary vendors, secure toeleveringsketens
5. Sustain Tech SuperiorityAI, quantum, crypto/blockchainFirst strategy to reference cryptocurrency
6. Build Talent & CapacityWorkforce pipelineSchools, industry, military cyber training

⚠️ Critical Tension: Deregulation vs Infrastructure Security

Pillar 2 calls for stripping back "burdensome cyber regulations" while Pillar 4 demands hardening kritieke infrastructuur. Beveiligingsonderzoekers warn these goals may be fundamentally contradictory — you can't deregulate and harden simultaneously. Organizations operating in both US and EU jurisdictions face a compliance paradox.

Wat dit betekent for the FBI Wiretap Breach

De strategie komt in de nasleep van a confirmed FBI wiretap system breach with suspected Chinese threat group involvement (Salt Typhoon). Het document waarschuwt expliciet: "Our adversaries have and will increasingly feel the consequences of their actions; we will dismantle networks, pursue hackers and spies."

🇪🇺 EU vs US: A Regulatory Collision Course

The US deregulatory push creates an unprecedented transatlantic divergence in cybersecurity policy. While Washington strips mandatory standards, Brussels is accelerating enforcement:

AreaUS (Trump Strategy)EU (NIS2/DORA/AI Act)
ApproachVoluntary, market-drivenMandatory, penalty-driven
RegulationDeregulate "burdensome" rulesNIS2: €10M fines, DORA: mandatory ICT risk
Incident ReportingNo new mandates24-hour verplichte rapportage
AI GovernanceAccelerate AI adoptionEU AI Act: risk-based classification
Supply ChainRemove "adversary vendors"Article 21: full toeleveringsketen liability
Crypto/BlockchainProtect and promoteMiCA regulation framework

Impact op mondiale organisaties

Bedrijven die in beide jurisdicties opereren worden nu geconfronteerd met een dual compliance burden. U moet tegelijkertijd:

💡 KENSAI aanbeveling: Standaard het strengere standaard toepassen. Als u voldoet aan NIS2 en DORA, overtreft u elke redelijke US security baseline. Gebruik het EU-kader als uw bodem, niet uw plafond.

🛡️ Gemini AI Chrome Vulnerability: CVE-2026-0628

Google heeft gepatcht CVE-2026-0628 (CVSS 8.8, High), an verhoging van rechten vulnerability in Gemini AI integrated into Chrome. Discovered by Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, de fout allowed malicious extensions with basic permissions to hijack the Gemini Live browser panel.

Dit is bijzonder zorgwekkend omdat:

Fake AI Extensions: A Growing Threat

Alongside the legitimate vulnerability, beveiligingsonderzoekers waarschuwen about a surge in fake "AI" browser extensions appearing in app stores. These extensions mimic popular AI tools but secretly exfiltrate user data. De aanval leverages user eagerness to adopt AI tools — a social engineering angle that bypasses traditional security controls.

📋 Microsoft Copilot DLP Changes — April 2026

Microsoft pakt aan a critical gap in its Copilot AI assistant: data loss prevention (DLP) policies were not being enforced on files stored outside OneDrive and SharePoint. This meant Copilot could inadvertently include confidential information from locally stored files in its responses.

Vanaf April 2026, Microsoft will apply DLP settings by default to prevent Copilot from accessing files without proper DLP labels. Key actions:

📅 March 2026 Patch Tuesday Forecast

Vooruitkijkend naar volgende week's Patch Tuesday:

📊 Regelgevingstijdlijn: Wat komt eraan?

DateRegulationWhat Happens
NowNIS2Enforcement active in 23/27 EU lidstaten
NowDORAFinancial entities moet voldoen — ICT risicobeheer mandatory
Apr 2026Microsoft Copilot DLPDefault DLP enforcement on AI assistant file access
Aug 2026EU AI ActHigh-risk AI system registration deadline
Q3 2026US Cyber StrategyImplementation memoranda and budget requests expected
2027NIS2 full audit cycleFirst enforcement review cycle across all lidstaten

🔑 Belangrijkste conclusies voor beveiligingsteams

  1. Don't let US deregulation lower your guard. If you operate in Europe, NIS2 and DORA remain mandatory regardless of US policy shifts.
  2. AI security is a real aanvalsoppervlak now. CVE-2026-0628 proves AI integrations create novel vulnerability classes. Audit all AI tools in your stack.
  3. Patch AI-adjacent vulnerabilities with urgency. Browser AI extensions and Copilot DLP gaps are actively being exploited.
  4. Plan for April's Copilot DLP changes. Label sensitive files now to avoid Copilot data leakage.
  5. Default to strictest applicable standard. NIS2 compliance covers you globally.

Navigeer de VS-EU regelgevingskloof

KENSAI maps your beveiligingshouding against NIS2, DORA, EU AI Act, and international standards simultaneously — zodat u overal voldoet, niet alleen ergens.

Start Free Security Scan →

Gepubliceerd door KENSAI Dreigingsinformatie · 7 maart 2026

Sources: CSO Online, Help Net Security, White House ONCD, Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, ENISA